On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +0200, ext Stephen Kelly wrote: > I'd like to see another model attempted next time, like all commits > going to master, and a 'stable' branch which gets fast forwarded once > a week > that's besides the point. people must work on the bleeding edge. bic/sic changes just don't fare well with downstream (whichever definition of that you apply), so they are diverted into a separate branch. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta lars.knoll
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Robin Burchell
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Stephen Kelly
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta lars.knoll
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5... Stephen Kelly
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Robin Burchell
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Giuseppe D'Angelo
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Rohan McGovern
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta jason.mcdonald
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Girish Ramakrishnan
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta lars.knoll
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta Quim Gil
- Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta jason.mcdonald
