On segunda-feira, 30 de abril de 2012 16.58.08, bradley.hug...@nokia.com wrote: > Seriously? What about my comment (plea) to revert the change that enabled > these warnings? As I mentioned before (and others in my team), these > warnings are hurting more than helping, and our time is much better spent > working on the desktop platform plugins than fixing warnings. > > Please, I hope you will reconsider, there's much more important things to be > done.
I'm not against postponing them. Really, if you need more time, then it's
completely understandable and we should give you more time. I could certainly
use more time because I have two high-importance tasks to do that need to be
done in 5.0, plus maybe looking into QList.
I'm acting on the belief that this is a beta-blocker task. If it is and you
need more time, then we may have to delay the beta too. Or, I am mistaken and
it is not a beta-blocker.
I've already spent almost a week getting the QRegExp const change done because
it seemed like the right thing to do and required for the beta. Given the
choice, I wouldn't have spent any time on it. And I have a couple more tasks
assigned to me that seem to be required for the beta, but I'll happily leave
them for later instead.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
