On Tue, 1 May 2012 06:50:55 ext Davet Jacques wrote: > Hi fellow Qt users, > > spread across various comment threads at the Qt developer forum, Qt Labs > blogs, and Qt mailing lists, there has recently been quite a bit of > discussion over the scope and priorities of Qt Quick, and whether or not > Nokia's (and the other Qt contributor's) roadmap, focus and design choices > align with the needs and preferences of the majority of Qt users. > > So I thought it might be interesting for everyone to get an overview over > where exactly Qt users as a whole (or at least those who are active in > Qt's online communities) would prefer Qt Quick 2.x to go (or not go) in > the near- or mid-term future. > > So there is now a corresponding poll (link at the bottom of this mail) > hosted at the Qt Developer forum. Completely unofficial, but still > worthwhile I think. >
For those interested in the path forward for actively prioritizing or developing these features, I've replied in devnet with some notes on each. > > Link to the poll: > http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16693/ -- Alan Alpert Senior Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
