On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:00:37AM +0000, ext [email protected] wrote: > Reverting it completely would fit in with saying that QRegExp is done > and close to being deprecated, so there's no benefit in SC breakages > in these classes. > otoh, the change has the potential to reveal subtle threading bugs that have been lingering for years. also, it is quite a motivator to port to qregularexpression right away as you are touching the code anyway. ^^ _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change? Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change? lars.knoll
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change... André Pönitz
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change? Robin Burchell
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change? Giuseppe D'Angelo
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp change... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp ch... lars.knoll
- Re: [Development] Reverting the QRegExp ch... Stephen Kelly
