On Thursday, May 03, 2012 23:00:49 Harri Porten wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> My suggestion is to replace them by callbacks and keep the setters in > >> a > >> private header. Someone is against this idea? > > > > Not at all. > > > > I suggested that the Squish and Gamma Ray developers get together and > > put > > together a proper callback implementation set, which we'll gladly use in > > Qt 5. I don't think that is high in their priority list, though. > > Oh, I missed that call. But we are happy to participate in a discussion. > In Berlin for example.
Yes, I'm sure we can talk about it at QtCS 2012. Myself and Volker will be there anyway. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
