I agree and cleaning up the mess is long overdue. The non-commercial clause certainly makes no sense as you say and LGPL might be problematic when it comes to re-use of QML code. I got the permissions to move existing headers over to BSD and will use that for the new ones as well. The required changes are currently pending on gerrit.
Cheers, Jens > Hi, > what is the license for Qt Desktop Components [0]? > The headers files don't seem to agree between each other: some are BSD, > some LGPL and carry this notice: > > ======== > ** No Commercial Usage > ** This file contains pre-release code and may not be distributed. > ** You may use this file in accordance with the terms and conditions > contained > ** in the Technology Preview License Agreement accompanying this package. > ** > ======== > > I should contribute some new file soon, so I'd like to know :-) > > Also (though this is probably off-topic), since this is a new project > and Nokia probably doesn't have any obligations with commercial > customers, wouldn't it make sense to remove the contribution agreement, > or at least not have the paragraph: > > ======== > ** Other Usage > ** Alternatively, this file may be used in accordance with the terms and > ** conditions contained in a signed written agreement between you and Nokia. > ======== > > Ciao, > Alberto > > [0]: http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtDesktopComponents > > -- > http://blog.mardy.it <- geek in un lingua international! > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
