On sexta-feira, 25 de maio de 2012 06.27.13, [email protected] wrote: > I agree with Andre. Currently we do not have any guiding criteria in > place, so it's probably difficult to judge when someone is ready to be > nominated as an approver. We've now had one or two cases where people > where being nominated a bit too fast for my taste. > > But I'd propose that we have a discussion to nail down the details at the > contributor summit. It's only a couple of weeks away, and these things are > usually discussed a lot easier in such a setting.
Hmm..
I think the rule-of-thumb guidance was part of the original project goals, but
we never managed to come up with the numbers. I think it's good that the
project will be 9 months old by the time we try to come up with those numbers.
We can look at past history and figure out what a committed contributor does.
> >On a related note, I also think it would be sensible to move the
> >barrier of entrance to "Handle JIRA" into the opposite direction.
> >Triaging issues or verification of fixes are definitely tedious and
> >reputable activities, but I don't think they necessarily need
> >preceding contributions, nor long term dedication.
> >
> >Andre'
I agree on that too. Besides, helping in triaging *is* a form of contribution.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
