On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:20:58AM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 7 de junho de 2012 10.06.31, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > it's not a no-op as soon as we actually implement some escaping > > mechanism. > > as joao pointed out, it is all about applying the decoding and escaping > > at the right layer - which is exactly when using posix file i/o > > functions, and nowhere else. as soon as you start doing it with cmdline > > args and the environment you are in workaround land, and that only > > increases the mess (because you don't know what encoding the other side > > uses - the only reasonable assumption is that it wants locale encoding > > (because that would be the right thing to do)). > > So you're saying that we don't need to pass these file names with broken > encoding to other applications, nor do we need to accept them in the command- > line. > correct
> I disagree. > you need to provide arguments which refute my "it only makes things worse" stance. > Maybe you'll want to revert this then: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,22854 > indeed _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
