On 19.06.2012 22:50, Brad King wrote: > On 06/19/2012 04:09 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Some small questions to the workflow: >> >> - I read on the workflow description site >> >> Topic Branch >> ... >> Heads not published (no named branch on server) >> >> What does this mean? I see all the named branches. > > I don't know to what text you refer. Where did you read this? >
Here: http://public.kitware.com/Wiki/Git/Workflow/Topic#Design Thanks for the explanations! Peter >> - And when I start browsing at >> http://cmake.org/gitweb >> the stage repository is not listed, is this by accident? > > We intentionally left it out to avoid confusing people looking > for the CMake repo. Developers get the link to the stage from > the Wiki: > > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Git#Repositories > >> - Is cmake.git automatically synchronized with stage/master >> and stage/next? > > Yes. Actually it is the other way: stage/(master|next) are > fetched from origin/(master|next). Scripts running in the > stage repo construct the merges but do not update the branches > locally. Instead the merges must be pushed to origin and > then fetched back from there. That avoids races between > pushes to the two repos. > > The general topic stage workflow is documented here: > > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Git/Workflow/Stage > > with ascii-art history diagrams at each step. > > -Brad > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development