Hi, Cutting things short: We are working on a solution, which will probably result in a work around. I will announce once it's done.
There is no point in further discussion. We all agree it sucks. But stupid firewall rules are a reality, like it or not. Let's get back to coding. Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: development-bounces+daniel.molkentin=nokia....@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+daniel.molkentin=nokia....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Sven Anderson Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:51 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Contributing to the Qt Project behind a hefty firewall and proxy server On 16.07.2012 15:26, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> Sorry, but bike locks have keys to disable them. The sanity bot have >> an option to override it. Where is that option in your firewall? > > Going through 443. No, going through 443 is _not_ an option of the firewall, it's like lock-picking a useless lock. >> You have no excuse. If you are supposed to work on Qt, your company >> should give you the infrasctructure to do your work. > > Unless it is fixable upstream which seems to be the case anyway. KDE > was able to fix this. Github was able to fix this. People so far > agreed upon to fix this for the Qt Project, so nothing really needed > afterwards to change at other places, just once. It's not a fix at all. It's a workaround. Important difference! Sven _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development