On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:32:53AM +1000, Rohan McGovern wrote: > Oswald Buddenhagen said: > > that's slight overkill. when you direct-push to a branch
> > with no activity, > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > you can just direct-push the staging branch as well - you just > > edit the command line, replacing heads with staging. > > Doing the staging-rebuild command would correctly take into account any > changes which are currently staged (if any). If you do a force push to > the staging branch, changes could be left in 'staged' state in the > database but not actually be present in the staging branch. > as force-pushing into a branch which has activity (from more than one person) is generally a no-go, this is a bit of a corner case. fwiw, i did no forced push - it was a fast-forward. the same would have worked for the staging branch, for the same reasons. but anyway, just sayin'. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
