On quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2012 16.01.34, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2012 13.21.03, [email protected] > > wrote: > > Wow… do you get the same results with Qt 4? I did quite a bit to optimize > > contention performance in Qt 4. I do know that mutex contention > > performance > > has regressed in Qt 5 on the Mac, I wasn't sure about on Linux, though. > > I haven't tested. I'll try that later, once I finish rewriting the locking > code.
The interesting thing is that, during the rewrite, I have discovered many of
the reasons why Olivier's code is like it is. I'm documenting it now.
Unfortunately, that also means the code can't be as simple as I had wanted it
to be.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
