From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of 
Loaden [[email protected]]
> I prefer:
> dev -> next
> stable -> master
> release -> release

-1, and +1 for the originally proposed version. For someone wanting to just 
check out 
something  that works, the "dev"/"stable"/"release" naming gives a fairly 
decent idea 
of what to expect. "master" has completely different meaning in different 
projects, 
there's no way to know what it might contain without consulting "external" 
documentation.
Also, since "master" has been used in the past, re-using it for a different(!) 
level will
cause confusion, as people will run into outdated information all over the net.

Andre'
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to