On Friday, September 21, 2012 16:47:11 Thiago Macieira wrote: > This is long, so I'll give you my recommendation first. If you agree with > me, you don't have to read the rest. If you disagree, you have to read my > arguments.
It seems like the this thread and the 'Qt 5 file hierarchy' are really part of the same proposal? It also seems like the proposal is updated a bit (eg for Mac). Can you post a combined update if so, so that we can ask distros what they think? We should find out if the proposal is 'good' to downstreams so that we can start moving on it. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
