On Oct 1, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, October 01, 2012 12:42:36 you wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Fully agree with you. However this wasn't in any way by intention. > > Hi Lars, > > That's great. Thanks for the prompt response and clarification. > >> Here's >> what I been told happened: > >> The reason here is that the YouTube “Qt Studios” account was (isn’t anymore) >> linked to the Qt Project Twitter account. > > If the QtStudios youtube account is to be used for Digia promotional videos > from now on instead of for Qt-Project purposes, then it likely shouldn't be > linked from the http://qt-project.org/ page on the bottom left (it is > currently). So far Qt Studio has been *the* place for Qt videos, independent of whether they were made for Qt commercial or Nokia or anybody else. I can't see a problem with having these videos there. The more we have, the better for Qt IMO. > I would also find QtCommercialStudios or similar a more apt name for the > Digia > promotional videos youtube account. > > As a separate fact, I find it surprising to repurpose the youtube account > like > that. Is anything preventing the repurposing of the twitter or other accounts > similarly? I can't see how it has been repurposed. The fact that Digia uploaded some of their video material there is IMO not a problem. There are just as many videos promoting Nokia's Qt usage there, as well as some content relating to e.g. ICS or froglogic. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
