On 9 October 2012 08:58, Ziller Eike <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9 Oct 2012, at 01:07, Giuseppe D'Angelo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> many thanks for the insightful mail. >> >> On 8 October 2012 22:49, Richard Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> […] > >>> == What Happens When an Issue is Reported? == >>> >>> * security@ should be sent to a 'core security' team of developers who need >>> not be maintainers. >> >> Maintainers in the meaning of the Qt governance model? If so, I think >> you meant Approvers here. In other words: I'd like to have any >> community member in the security team, if it makes sense for them to >> stay there. > > There's a "not" in that sentence, though I also find it not well placed ;)
I'll reword that to make it clearer. What I mean is that people can be on the security team without being maintainers - ie. it is not simply a list for maintainers. Cheers Rich. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
