On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:39:35AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2012 18.04.18, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:01:28PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > As for mkspecs, I believe they should be in share, since they are > > > technically- speaking arch-independent. > > > > except for qconfig.pri, which spoils the whole party. > > Right... how difficult would it be to make qmake search for the mkspecs in > two > different paths? > $prefix/share/qt5/mkspecs > $prefix/lib/qt5/mkspecs > ? > > If it's hard, then we need to put them all in lib. > it wouldn't be terribly hard. it would just make some (well spread) code more complex. basically, $$[QT_HOST_DATA]/mkspecs/<somefile> would turn into $$search_path(QMAKE_MKSPECS, <somefile>) or something like that (that function needs to be written yet).
fwiw, the default mkspec links would need to go to lib, too, obviously. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
