On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:

> On quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2012 18.23.49, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> I am against making QML2 a subdirectory of imports (ie. option a1). So
>> either a separate directory, or we keep the QML 1 modules in a
>> subdirectory. Both are ok for me. 
> 
> cf the layout proposal:
> 
> lib/qt5/imports       -> Qt Quick 1.x imports, all
> lib/qt5/qml2          -> Qt Quick 2.x imports, arch-depedent
> share/qt5/qml2        -> Qt Quick 2.x imports, arch-independent
> 
> We don't need to implement the arch-independent support now. We can add it 
> later with Qt 5.1.

Yes, let's please leave it out for now.
> 
> Note that I called it "qml2" because it's based on the QML 2 engine. That 
> means it would apply to Cascades code using QML 2, not just Qt Quick 2.

Should we have the '2' in the name? We've avoided it other places as well so 
far. Another option would be to call the directory 'modules'. 

Cheers,
Lars

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to