On 2012-10-19, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have, as a distributor, frequently gotten 'hate' in #qt for providing >> switchable qmakes. >> > using (debian style) altenatives for that is pretty stupid.
I guess that proves my point quite good... > as i've already written about three times, this is an argument for you > guys finally agreeing on something and actually sticking to it, not > upstream forcing this change on *all* users. Assuming distro1 needs change A and B to be applied to be in line with distro policies, distro2 needs change B and C, and distro 3 needs change D and E, and all distros want to do as little changes to upstream as possible... I guess distros and stuff could do a permanent fork thingie, but do we, as in Qt Project actually want to encourage that? Like go-oo.org? like eglibc? like ... Really. I really want, both as a Qt contributor and a Qt packager to ship a pristine Qt. Please help me make it happen. *hugs* and *kisses* /Sune _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
