On 20/10/12 07:35, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Really, I don't care what qmake5 is and where it points to, so long as: > a) it exists > b) it works > c) it's the official and documented way of creating Qt applications in Qt 5 > > Any other names are under the customer's taste.
Surely then the various proposals are effectively in alignment? Filling in the gaps, I see this: /usr/bin/qmake5 <- documented - distros do not fuck with this /usr/bin/qmake <- distros fuck with this so it may not be what you think /something/bin/qmake <- and all the other qt bins pkg-config -some query = /something/bin <- for finding the qt bins And then my source build, plus Win/Mac builds look like: bin/qmake5 <- documented bin/qmake <- still here I'm pretty sure qmake was the only contentious binary but any other binary that needs to be installed into /usr/bin and conflicts with a qt 4 version can be treated the same way. The qmake5 can be a symlink on Linux+Mac. On Windows... you get a copy. Is that really so bad? -- Link _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
