On 11/6/2012 7:52 PM, d3fault wrote: > You want to obey a randomly declared 'feature-freeze' It wasn't randomly declared. :D It has been set in stone since around May and is standard practice for open source projects near time for a stable release usually starting at the first beta release. Otherwise, a stable release would never get done. Don't tell me you don't understand why.
> and decline a > SUPERIOR re-design that can only take place during BC breakages? It's > not like it'd be that hard to implement. Sure, we're in a feature > freeze.... but that's nothing compared to a 'BC promise' that 5 will > set in stone. > > <*insert holy war argument here*> > > d3fault > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
