On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Alan Alpert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Jana Aurindam <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>>> To summarize QML tool naming discussion so far: >>>> >>>> In qtquick1 repo >>>> qmlviewer -> qml1viewer >>>> qmlplugindump -> qml1plugindump >> >>> That's already the name, isn't it? >> >>>> In qtdeclarative repo >>>> qmlscene -> qml2scene >>>> qmlplugindump -> qml2plugindump >>>> qmlbundle -> move to playground >>>> qmlmin -> qmlmin >>>> qmlprofiler -> qmlprofiler >>>> qmltestrunner -> qml2testrunner >>>> qmleasing -> qml2easing >>>> easingcurveeditor -> qml2easing (merge tools) >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any further feedback on QML tool renaming before these >>>> get implemented? >> >>> I don't feel too strong about the particular names anymore. But if you're >>> changing the names of especially qmlplugindump, qmlviewer, qmlscene, it >>> should go in fast ! We need to fix Qt Creator then, too, and I >guess also >>> a bunch of documentation ... >> >> I am quite against the renaming of binaries. >> Does qml2scene mean that there is an equivalent qml1scene? >> what is the difference between qmlviewer in qt 4.8 and qt 5.0 that a >> renaming is necessary? > > Differences between qmlviewer and qmlscene > qmlviewer only: > -Renders QtQuick 1 scenes. > -Has some built in testing functionality > -Has some additional development UI (logger window, screen shots, and such) > qmlscene only: > -Renders QtQuick 2 scenes. > > If the names are left as they are, it's not entirely clear which to > use in your development. qml1viewer for qml1 and qml2scene for qml2 > makes this fairly clear.
And if you meant leave qmlviewer without the 1, there are utilities that run on both QML 1 and 2 which are going without the 1 to signify this. So while qmlviewer hasn't changed between Qt 4 and Qt 5, the world around it has. -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
