On 12/03/2012 03:46 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: > On Dec 2, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> On domingo, 2 de dezembro de 2012 14.52.12, Knoll Lars wrote: >>>> Most of the pending changes in master today are fixes that need to go into >>>> the 5.0 release, so the branch should be merged to stable, not dev. >>> >>> I have been seeing lots of pending changes in master that are 5.1 material >>> and being held back. So this way seems to be the safer approach. >>> >>> Merging to stable has the disadvantage that we don't see what's going to be >>> in 5.0, so I would prefer to rather make it explicit. Pushing changes to >>> stable is not such a big problem. >> >> We can finish the 5.0 changes in master for a week, merge that to stable, >> then >> open it for the queued 5.1 changes and merge that. > > I'm a bit worried that this would make it harder to get the RC out of the > door. > >> Note that most of the 5.1 changes have a "WIP" in their names and will >> require >> re-pushing to Gerrit for a new commit message. Isn't that prevented by >> Gerrit? > > True, these need to be re-pushed to dev in any case. > > Cheers, > Lars >
Hi, So as far as I understand, we should merge 'master' into 'dev' at some point (twice a week?) and then delete the 'master' branch at some point. This is mainly because we don't want to take non-blockers into 'stable'. For those who need something into 'stable' which is already merged in 'master' I think that one solution could be to cherry-pick the specific sha1 from 'master' into 'stable' and then push to 'refs/for/stable'. A new CI run is needed though. Other ideas are welcomed. If you are going to push something directly to 'stable', please provide a Task-number to a blocker issue in JIRA. Let's try to *just* push fixes for things that will block the release <https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27426>, everything else should go to 'dev'. Cheers, -- Sergio Ahumada Release Engineer - Digia, Qt _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development