On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 December 2012 18:57, André Pönitz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I actually think it's still to specfic. Upgrading from Qt 5.0 to 5.1 >> would need touching all source files. So >> >> import QtQml from TheQtIUse >> import QtQuick from TheQtIUse >> >> and some one-liner somewhere that relates "TheQtIUse" with "Qt 5.0", >> perhaps even through the build system should be even better. > > Am I missing something or if we would really like to do that in the > future, then we should immediately raise a P0 bug against the Qt 5.0 > release and ask for the QML QtWebKit import to be renamed to > QtWebKit2?
I think you're missing something because I cannot imagine a case where the QtWebKit import would actually *need* to change its name. But I'm missing the train of thought that gets you there from where the discussion was at ;) . -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
