On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:24:46PM +0100, Knoll Lars wrote: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:59:07AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> On quarta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2012 14.03.52, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +0000, Knoll Lars wrote: > >>>> master is closed for new pushes and will go away in a couple of weeks by > >>>> the latest. > >>> this has happened now - the master branches are all deleted. > >>> > >>> due to the mess found in the master branches, i simply deleted them > >> > >> Would you please stop making project-wide decisions without posting to the > >> mailing list and letting people chime in? > >> > > considering the scope of the enterprise (seven commits total), > > discussing this on irc with a relevant guy (sahumada) seemed wholly > > sufficient. > > The scope is not the problem. It's still the right thing to let people > know *before* the actions are taken. Posting that mail is not > difficult. > thiago complained about the decision making process, not the announcement.
and regarding announcements: to be reasonably effective, it would need to be done at least a day in advance. given the minor impact (*) and the potential (**) time-criticality, i don't think this would have been a reasonable delay. (*) there was actually some fallout on the CI. but let's face it: the delay wouldn't have changed anything, because the root cause was lying several days in the past and nobody was aware of it. (**) judging by the enthusiasm of the reviewers, nobody seems to actually care for these commits ... _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
