On 18.12.2012 12.25, "Sean Harmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:00:25 Vladimir Minenko wrote:
>> > Sounds reasonable.
>> > Laszlo
>>
>> Folks, how can we conclude on this?
>>
>> There were two votes "Sounds reasonable", one comment with doubts from
>> Tuukka and one more "natural" from Sergio.
>>
>> How do we proceed now? More comments? Some details for the expressed
>>doubts?
>> Some actions?
>
>I vote for yes, create a vendor branch, but then I suggested it to Peter
>in
>the first place on irc.
>
>It keeps the work flow the same, the legal process is unchanged, has
>precedent, and allows the work to still be done in the open without
>causing
>unnecessary delays.
In case we decide to proceed with creation of a vendor branch, is it
planned to be a temporary solution or something permanent?
Yours,
Tuukka
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
