On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2012 14:55:51 Peter Hartmann wrote: > > > Alternatively I guess we could just clone the repo into a team clone. > > What is wrong with that option? > Different workflow, less visibility from the Qt contributors and so forth. > > Is it really important that everyone who wants to clone Qt 4 will also have > your branch? > I have never realized that a burden, but perhaps I am missing something. > Maybe separate clones are the way to go for that kind of patches. > Perhaps not. See above. Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
