On 12/20/2012 07:41 PM, Mitch Curtis wrote: > On Thursday, December 20, 2012 06:46:32 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Mitch Curtis wrote: > > > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility > > > > the part about behavior compatibility makes no sense at all - it's part > > of binary compatibility. you can change released behavior only if it is > > clearly bogus, and even then be careful (you can be _a little_ less > > conservative in minor releases than in patch releases). > > > > the definite guide to qt-related binary compat is > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B > > - just link to it. > > Thanks Ossi (and others on #qt-labs). Have removed the behavioural > compatibility stuff and am now linking to KDE's definitions of > compatibility. >
Mitch, You might want to get tst_bic to work now if you are interested on this https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtqa/trees/master/tests/postbuild/bic I havent tried myself, but I think that you might need: - Generate the vtables with gen.sh - Fix tst_bic.cpp to make Qt 5 compatible - Run some tests (in theory) cd <qtmodule> QT_MODULE_TO_TEST=$PWD /path/to/tests/postbuild/bic/tst_bic Maybe you also need https://codereview.qt-project.org/43351 merged first. Cheers, -- Sergio Ahumada [email protected] _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
