Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:31:29PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: >> Here are useful reports about binary and source compatibility between >> Qt4 and Qt5 APIs: >> >> Binary compatibility: >> http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/qt/4.8.4_to_5.0.0/abi_compat_report.html >> > this report is completely useless. there is no binary compat promise > between major qt versions. > >> Source compatibility: >> http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/qt/4.8.4_to_5.0.0/src_compat_report.html >> > this report could be more useful. for example, the qtphonon and > qt3support parts have been intentionally removed. still listing them in > the report (especially in full detail) is just adding noise. some parts > have been "demoted" to private api - it's technically correct to list > them, but not in this much detail. > the parser doesn't seem to be too clever - iiuc, it appears to be > complaining about merged overloads.
The qtphonon and qt3support related changes have been removed from the report. -- Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
