On sexta-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2012 19.11.32, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > On 25 December 2012 01:35, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > On segunda-feira, 24 de dezembro de 2012 06.30.58, Sascha Cunz wrote: > >> But strictly spoken, I would rather say no: BC is BC no matter what silly > >> mistakes it includes (I have actually had to deal with code that used the > >> above mentioned inheritance layouts). > >> OTOH, it's still very early in the life of released Qt5. > > > > We can change the soname for the library. libQt5Multimedia.so.6. > > I've never seen Qt DLLs that have additional numbers on Windows; is > the changing-soname approach acceptable on Windows and Mac?
It's acceptable on Mac, for the .dylib (non-framework) builds. For framework builds as well as for Windows, we'd have to invent some new method. On Windows, the Qt DLLs have always had the version number: QtCore4.dll and Qt5Core.dll. However, we're now proposing separating the source version (5) from the binary version (6). > Whatever solution is taken, we'll need to add notes to the > documentation of both classes, either to say "Binary files that > include this interface are incompatible between Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1", or > "This interface class contains a bug, do not perform a deletion > through it." Agreed. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
