Hi,
While I was trying to mark tst_headers as significant again
<https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-324> I found out that I had
to add some QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros to some headers.
After some investigation and talks with Thiago, I realized this macro expands
to nothing, so I decided to remove the check in tst_headers instead of adding
the missing QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros
<https://codereview.qt-project.org/44076>.
So far, this change does not affect Qt in any way, but I now want to go a
little bit further and remove the check in 'syncqt'
<https://codereview.qt-project.org/44810>
As the commit message says, this macro "might be removed", which is why I
writing this email now.
What do you think about removing QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER all over the place for
5.1 ?
Cheers,
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
