This only makes sense; it can't destabilize affairs and to cock block yourself on potential market share seems ludicrous at best.
w00t Donald On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Frederik Gladhorn <[email protected]> wrote: > Tirsdag 15. januar 2013 15.01.35 skrev Rafael Roquetto: >> Hello, >> >> I have submitted the following device mkspec for review: >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44840 >> >> I am wondering if this ok that it has been submitted directly to the stable >> branch. This is an orthognal* mkspec, so I personally don't see any problems >> but I would like to discuss this before taking action. >> >> I also wonder if the same rationale applies for any orthogonal change. >> >> Any comments? > > Since this is quite unlikely to break anyone else's build, I'd say it should > not be a problem. > > Generally speaking though only bug fixes should go into stable, so you'll have > to declare it a build fix ;) > > Cheers > Frederik > > > >> >> Thanks, >> Rafael >> >> * "Orthogonality is one of the most important properties that can help make >> even complex designs compact. In a purely orthogonal design, operations do >> not have side effects; each action (whether it's an API call, a macro >> invocation, or a language operation) changes just one thing without >> affecting others. There is one and only one way to change each property of >> whatever system you are controlling." - The Art of Unix Programming, Eric >> Raymond. > -- > Best regards, > Frederik Gladhorn > Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt > Visit us on: http://qt.digia.com > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
