> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Peter Kümmel > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 2:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 -- Release Testing > > On 18.01.2013 14:37, Motyka Rafal wrote: > [...] > I tested the mingw binaries and wondered why you don't install MinGW too. > There a are so much different mingw versions and if the precompiled > libraries should work the compiler must match. > At least you should document which mingw version you've used and maybe > provide a link to the binaries, I assume http://origin.releases.qt- > project.org/prebuilt/mingw_32/x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev1.7z
The toolchain will be part of the next packages. > Any special reason to use sjlj? Or just because it is the default? Well, it seems that dw2 (while faster) does not allow unwinding of stacks through system dll's, or dll's not compiled with a dw2 compiler. That's why I thought sjlj would be the 'safe route'. It's also btw the one available on 64 bit. Details are also at: http://qt-project.org/wiki/MinGW-64-bit Regards Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
