On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:17:12PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Charley Bay <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, Alan-- > > > >> charley: > >> > >> > I've implemented a C++ "adapter-layer" (mostly template-based) > >> > to expose C++ objects to QML. <snip>, > > > > > >> > >> Sounds like this is for developers using Qt, not working on Qt. > >> > >> qt-interest is the correct ML for that (although given the > >> youthful state of QML, this could also suggest improvements to QML > >> later. But we can worry about that later). > > > > > > Agreed -- although I'm tentatively suggesting the Qt-proper > > libraries offer this API layer natively (in the Qt distribution), > > as I'd assume most users with heavy C++ libs would need it. Still, > > your point is valid, so I can move lists with this discussion (if > > there's insufficient interest here). > > If people on this list are watching developing use of Qt for user > conveniences that should become part of the framework, they're > probably on qt-interest already. I'm subscribed to that list > (although I only check the QML related mails). You probably won't > *reach* any users with heavy C++ libs (beyond Qt ;) ) on this list. > So I definitely think this thread should have started on qt-interest, > and maybe moved to development later if it reaches conclusions that > there's something we should add to Qt.
Discussions about potential additions to Qt are certainly in order on [email protected]. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
