On 01/02/13 18:41, Knoll Lars wrote: > Sounds like a left over from Nokia times. I've now fixed if for the parts > where we have maintainers to be in line with Qt 5. >
I could have sworn it listed the proper maintainers previously. Thanks for that! > Cheers, > Lars > > > On Jan 29, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Lorn Potter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I just noticed all the QtMobility bugs list satu makela as the lead for >> all components. >> Since when did this happen? I saw no email announcing this change. As >> far as I know, I did not abdicate my standing/maintainership of my >> components there. >> >> I believe this is wrong, as for one, I should be listed as the lead for >> sensors and systeminformation (same as for Qt5), so bugs will be >> assigned to the proper maintainer. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lorn Potter >> Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > -- Lorn Potter Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
