> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2013 12:14 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Development] QtWindowsExtras > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread. > > > > > > I've now created the repository. > > > ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git. > > > > ehm. yeah. and i fixed the setup. ;) > > the project is currently not CI-controlled. is this expected to change > soon?
I'll set it up as soon as possible. Simo > > > Lars, just double checking for making sure: you meant to create > > qt/qtwinextras or more like playground as playground/qtmacextras? > > > this question is actually why i didn't create the project to start with > - x11extras is under qt/, while macextras is in playground/. > > anyway, i'll use this to raise a general point: i think the idea to put > new projects physically under playground/ and then actually moving them > upon graduation is counterproductive: > - as we know, gerrit is too limited to actually allow it, and nobody has > bothered yet to do the manual work for the already graduated project > (i can give it a shot, but don't shout if i accidentally take down the > system ... (i'm positive it would be only temporary :D)). > - changing the location of the repository is slightly disruptive > - we have no process to "un-graduate" projects. think qtpim and the > sorts. this is "pr-wise unfair" to the projects which are actually > stable (but still must stay in playground for technical reasons). > > therefore i'd like to propose the following alteration of the process: > - nothing changes for projects which are not meant to graduate on their > own. think playground/qtbinaryjson. > - all other projects are created in the hierarchy they are aiming for > - their maturity is represented solely by some external meta > information: > - a wiki page (do we have one which could serve this already?) > - the set of modules init-repository would clone by default (see also > https://codereview.qt-project.org/41547 and > https://codereview.qt-project.org/41548 (i plan to actually add more > in a later commit)) > - alternatively, it would be possible to create a separate branch of > the supermodule which includes more submodules than the mainline > branches. it would be bothersome to maintain this, though. > - projects which are positively abandoned could be physically moved to a > separate "namespace" (pending technical obstacles of actually moving) > > discuss! > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
