On sexta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2013 15.43.57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:07PM +0000, Shaw Andy wrote: > > Now that the merge has done, doesn't this in effect mean that stable > > is now in reality Qt 5.1.0 based as dev will be merged to stable on > > 15th March? > > this may very well happen, yes. > it's still a good idea to push fixes to stable: a) you never know and b) > distributors may pick them up even if we never make another release of > the branch. > conversely, this means that stable is still utterly taboo for features.
Indeed, there's still time to do a 5.0.3 if we wanted to. Here's a good question: should we tag/branch the stable branch just before the dev merge? Otherwise finding those commits later (think one year later) might be difficult. But this is the sign I was waiting for to switch my main development branch from stable to dev. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
