On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: > > Qt::toHICON > Qt::toHBITMAP > Qt::toCGImageRef > Qt::toNSString > > It's obvious to which platform each function belongs; there's no need to > qualify it beyond necessary. If WinRT introduces an NSString class and OS X > adds HBITMAPs only then should we think about adding the platform name to the > function. :)
That means we're restricting ourselves to type conversion functions? A function that's potentially useful on more than one platform wouldn't be possible. BR, Joerg _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
