On terça-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2013 07.03.37, BRM wrote:
> Personally, I can easily seem myself replacing my current QThread usages
> with this functionality; but I'd want to be able to receive both
> start/finished signals (for logging purposes) and be able to interact with
> the QThread object - so the Trampoline object would need to provide an
> interface by which to access the internal QThread, or be a pass thru for
> signals/slots of the QThread.

Why? Why do you need access to the QThread object? Please don't answer the
started / finshed signals -- those will be provided.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to