On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Jake Thomas Petroules <jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> I suppose it would not be a detriment. Where do you draw the line? Which > platforms, what functions and types? I would leave that decision to the platform maintainers. An initial minimal set would be good though, for example OS X/iOS and windows. > > Here are some candidate types for constructors and conversion operators on > their corresponding Qt types, which I can think of off the top of my head: > > Windows: > POINT > RECT > HICON > HBITMAP > > Darwin (OS X + iOS): > CGPoint > CGSize > CGRect > NSPoint > NSSize > NSRect > CGImageRef > CIImage > NSImage > NSString > and CFArrayRef/NSArray <-> QList<T> ? Seems like a good list to me. I would wait with the last one.. NSArray is really QList<QVariant>. > I'm not sure about other platforms/environments like X11, Wayland, or perhaps > GNOME. > It does require a Q_OS define, so it might not make sense for those platforms. Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development