On Thursday 28 February 2013 18:35:23 Sze Howe Koh wrote: > So, TBB is the shiniest at the moment, as it can replace all of > QtConcurrent's functionality and more. I'm happy to set up the project > to Qt-ify TBB, if people think it's a good idea and if we get a legal > green light.
What exactly do you want to use TBB for? Can we not just suggest users to use TBB directly? And just make sure Qt play nice with it. Or do you want to make a wrapper library to qt-ify it? What exactly do you want to qt-ify? Is it only the underscores and naming conventions or is there more to do? Or do you think Qt could use TBB for implementing some of the algorithms within the Qt library? -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
