On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sandro Andrade <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:43PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether this request is actually feasible but would we >>> have too much impact if we rename qtmof playground repository to qtmodeling >>> ? >>> >> i have it figured out now, so actually renaming it is trivial and >> lossless. >> however, consider that there is an impact on all existing users of the >> repository, as they need to adjust the remote. > > That wouldn't generate too much noise since I'm currently the only > maintainer, one other person has been testing it, and there is only > one clone in gitorious. I can contact it directly whether clones aren't > automatically updated. > >> >> also, our new policy is to put the module in its final destination and >> represent its maturity via external means (wiki, etc.) (though these >> means are not actually implemented yet, i think). so where do you >> envison this repository to end up? > > IIRC, that's intended to become a Qt Add-On, but it still in playground.
Oswald, if everything is fine could you or Sergio do the repository renaming ? Thanks, Sandro > > Thanks, > Sandro > >> >>> Also, could we have CI running on it ? >>> >> that's for someone else to comment on ... >> >> regards >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
