On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 15.30.42, David Faure wrote: > > correct (though, if it really is a performance *fix*, you should > > consider 5.1/stable). > > Well, performance *improvements*. > > AFAIU these should go into dev, because of the higher risk of regressions.
Depends on the change. It's up to the contributor and reviewers to decide whether the change is too complex for stable. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
