On Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:25:58 Rex Dieter wrote: > > What is in your configure line? > > gory detail here, > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-qtbase.spec
Interesting that you don't use nomake-tests. Do you run the tests too? To verify that the cmake files work, after installing the packages, please try to run the unit tests for cmake which are in each repo/tarball with something like this: cd tests/auto/cmake && mkdir build && cd build && cmake .. && ctest Each module source package has those tests. See also: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines#2edf0c39136a2b7d30b5896787928be7 > > Does the patch b9c1593435db3ed44e23c23dc19f22d7a68d7b01 help? > > > > You may also want 7ac58d1ff0815566ba1de09519299b5119e5ee91. See also the > > bug linked at > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.user/45855 > > I'll check this too, thanks. Though, I'm not sure this could possibly help, > since cmake isn't used at all at buildtime when those cmake files get > generated (does it?). The 7ac58d1ff0815566ba1de09519299b5119e5ee91 wouldn't help with this issue, but if you were going to stick with packaging 5.0.1 with possibly the b9c1593435db3ed44e23c23dc19f22d7a68d7b01 patch, you would want to cherry-pick the other patch too. Otherwise your users would have trouble using the Qt5 cmake files. As it looks like you're going to switch to 5.0.2 already, this seems to be a non-issue indeed. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
