On sexta-feira, 17 de maio de 2013 11.37.19, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > We should agree practice for the community build maintainers. > > Would the existing maintainer model fit this purpose? > > The approach could be, e.g.: > > 1. We agree together that there is something we want to have with Qt (such > has already been to large extent agreed for more MinGW configurations, > Ministro Android distribution and Tizen). > > 2. There exists someone who wants to provide the builds > > 3. Nomination of the build maintainer is done according to our governance > model (similar to other maintainers) > > 4. Sysadmin creates needed access for the appointed maintainer to place > packages into download.qt-project.org (e.g. under community builds)
I agree. Our resources are limited, so having the process above (which is quite simple) should suffice for builds we host. For builds we do not host, such as Aleksey's MinGW builds, I propose we simply list them in the downloads page and link directly. We should do that for Linux distribution packages too. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
