On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 18:33:14, Knoll Lars wrote: > >Past experience shows that this does not work. It won't be checked, and > >even > >if it is checked, all the issues won't be fixed in time. > > > >If we disable the tests, let's do it with open eyes: there will be > >regressions > >and we'd be accepting them. > > > > > > > >I agree with Thiago here. > > Yes, he's right. We can do manual work trying to avoid any regressions, > but they are likely to happen. Still if we can't get the server fixed, > it's IMO better to mark these tests as insignificant then to have many > failed CI runs.
I wasn't saying we shouldn't do it. I'm saying that if we do it, we must have open eyes: there will be regressions. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
