On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected]>wrote:
> > In the long run if we want to have a mechanism that detects what has > been changed and which tests should be run, then we need to start designing > it. How would it work? > > I don't think you can reliably figure out when a test is or isn't > relevant to a change. And the only good reason to do it is if the > tests take too long. If unrelated tests fail, they should be *fixed*, > not skipped when they aren't relevant to the change. > Yes, in an ideal world ... However, sometimes people need to become pragmatic to get things done step by step.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
