On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel wrote: > On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote: > > Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care > > that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggestion again. > > > > See you in six months :P > > > Sorry haven't seen this thread. I'm working in several customer projects > now using purely QML/JS. Some other developers do the C++ parts. When we > work with customers we have a similar split: Frontend Developers do the > QML/JS code and Backend Developers do the C++ code. We work with > frontend developers who don't have a great understanding of C++ and also > are not interested in it. They are interested into ui elements / > animations / javascript / concepts / recipies, etc... A mailing list > where people speak about Qt/C++ mixed with some QML/JS would just > confuse them.
Those frontend developers are surely not overly interested in the _development of Qt_, more of it's use, for which there's already [email protected]. > I think there is a great need to have an open forum / mailing list for > QML/JS users. Not sure if a Qt mailinglist is the right place for > people, but better than a mixed mailing list. Maybe for _users_ of QML and JavaScript. And if so, this should be clear in the naming of the list, e.g. by calling it [email protected]. For the _development_ of QML the reasons to have discussions, most notably those that have impact on the rest of Qt, in the public have not suddenly disappeared. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
