On quarta-feira, 4 de setembro de 2013 16:03:31, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > On 9/4/13 15:58 , Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > On 4 September 2013 15:21, Poenitz Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's wasting our time, as predicted. > >> > >> ../../corelib/tools/qdatetime.cpp: In function 'time_t qt_mktime(QDate*, > >> QTime*, QDateTimePrivate::Spec*, QString*, bool*)': > >> ../../corelib/tools/qdatetime.cpp:258:34: error: comparison between > >> signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare] cc1plus: > >> all warnings being treated as errors > > > > How did the -Werror patch got integrated if qtbase doesn't build? Did > > it cover more compilers than the ones available in CI? > > CI not using -developer-build I presume?
Yes, that's what I said in my email. It was highly unlikely that it would have
got integrated the first time if the builds used -Werror.
That's why there's an opt-in option: configure -warnings-are-errors (or
configure -Werror).
For those who do not want to participate in the fixing of warnings but still
want to do developer builds:
configure -developer-build -no-warnings-are-errors
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
