On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > Either that or not rushing into porting everything to QJob. Having it in a > separate library would mean having QtCoreJobs, QtNetworkJobs, etc. Doesn't > seem to be very flexible. >
I also think it makes sense to have a separate playground module for experiment as Thiago and Konstantin suggested. It would be similar to qtlogger, scene graph, etc which can then later be merged back into main modules if needed. Although, having a playground module even after stabilized for a somewhat similar scenario as QIODevice: network devices, core devices, etc, seems a bit inconsistent, especially if it was also a common functionality as it seems, and not corner case. If it is not a that common functionality, then perhaps, yes... -- Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
